Composable Commerce Solution Providers: Services, How to Choose + 10 Best Companies

Executive Summary

• The leading composable commerce solution providers differ sharply in engineering depth, integration quality, and delivery maturity.
•     Nova Cloud stands out with AWS-native automation, Datadog-driven observability, and nearshore collaboration. It drives faster, more reliable results than standard eCommerce platforms.
•     Expect clear, actionable insights on cost efficiency, modular deployment, and how composable stacks improve scalability and long-term ROI.
  
  

Curious how this applies to your setup? See what measurable gains Nova Cloud can deliver for your architecture by booking a demo to review it in detail.

***

Composable commerce is how modern enterprise retailers are scaling in practice.

And you’ve likely already replatformed parts of your stack or started decoupling systems, but finding the right partner still feels like the hardest step.

Every provider claims flexibility, speed, and better digital commerce outcomes, yet few prove how they achieve them.

That’s why you need an objective comparison.

In this article, you’ll see how leading providers stack up, what sets them apart, and how Nova Cloud leads in measurable performance and architectural maturity.

Let's get started.

What Are Composable Commerce Services?

Composable commerce services mean building, implementing, and refining modular eCommerce stacks through an API-first approach and MACH architecture.

Instead of relying on a single monolithic platform, you bring together independent components that connect seamlessly. This includes storefronts, search, checkout, and personalization. Each element works as a service, so you can replace or upgrade it without interrupting the rest of your system.

That flexibility is why adoption keeps growing, so now most brands have already adopted some form of composable commerce model. The message here is clear: companies that use modularity react faster to market changes and deliver better customer experiences.

Here are the core capabilities behind composable commerce services:

•     Modular and microservices architecture.
•     Platform integrations (commercetools, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, Shopify Plus).
•     Front-end frameworks (React, Next.js, Hydrogen).
•     APIs for packaged business capabilities like checkout, PIM, and personalization.
•     Infrastructure built on AWS or Azure.
•     Continuous UX and performance optimization.

Also, you can check out the full video for a clear, real-world explanation of how composable commerce works:

Why Businesses Need Composable Commerce Services

Businesses need composable commerce services to speed up innovation, cut dependency on rigid platforms, and deliver consistent shopping experiences across every channel.

In fact, according to a 2025 report, early adopters see the best results; they achieve faster time-to-market for new features and better overall customer experience.

For marketing leaders, eCommerce directors, and CTOs, this all leads to faster experimentation and sharper execution.

With a microservices-based architecture, each part of your stack can evolve on its own timeline without disrupting production. This includes your checkout, search, or content management system.

That separation changes how you work.

It means updates ship sooner, product launches happen faster, and customer-facing systems stay available during changes. Unlike monolithic systems that force synchronized releases, composable stacks support continuous improvement and flexible scaling.

So, what does this tell you? Composable adoption is about measurable agility, sustained control, and long-term competitive strength.

Let’s see the companies that can help you get these benefits.

Top Composable Commerce Solution Providers

The top composable commerce solution partners are Nova Cloud, Aries Solutions, Avensia, SkillNet Solutions, among others. These companies deliver flexible architectures, advanced eCommerce integrations, and proven results across industries.

These top providers are redefining how enterprise teams scale modular systems, enhance digital storefronts, and manage performance. Let’s see how they stack up:

1. Nova Cloud

Nova Cloud helps you design, build, and manage end-to-end composable commerce ecosystems directly on AWS. Our focus is on making every component work as one agile system, from the frontend to the backend. With MACH-based architecture and full DevOps automation, Nova Cloud helps you build modular stacks that scale as your business evolves.

We can handle everything from legacy audits to microservice development, cloud-native deployments, and continuous optimization. Through nearshore collaboration and AWS-certified engineering, our team delivers faster releases, stable operations, and lower long-term costs.

Our clients get solid outcomes.

For example, Nova Cloud helped Recurate migrate from a semi-monolithic setup to a serverless AWS-based architecture. The result was a 7x faster client onboarding, 99.999% uptime, and a 60x revenue increase for a UK retail client.

If you want similar results, schedule a free strategy session today!

Pros:

•     AWS-native, fully automated CI/CD and observability.
•     Proven migration strategy for legacy monoliths.
•     Real-time collaboration with nearshore DevOps teams.

Cons:

•     Focused on engineering-heavy projects, less suitable for DIY use.

Pricing: Starts with a custom architecture assessment based on project scope.

2. Aries Solutions

Aries Solutions offers API-first composable development across Magento, Shopify, WordPress, React, and Angular. It builds headless and modular commerce using API-first architecture and headless commerce principles.

They include structured discovery, fixed-fee assessments, and guided vendor selection. This firm also uses an internal MACH Booster accelerator and a “Do No Harm” rollout method to limit disruption during platform shifts.

One example is Powell’s Books, where Aries moved the business from a homegrown stack to commercetools, Algolia, and Contentstack. As a result, Powell handled larger product catalogs and adjusted its change process.

While Aries offers strategic guidance for composable adoption, they center on vendor selection and governance. Nova Cloud, on the other hand, is built for hands-on engineering: architecting, automating, and optimizing composable ecosystems directly on AWS.

Pros:

•     Offers guidance on vendor and architecture options.
•     Uses pre-built assets during rollout.
•     Applies a staged cutover process.

Cons:

•     Heavy reliance on Aries’ framework and roadmap.
•     Preferred vendor network may increase future vendor lock-in.
•     Requires ongoing engagement rather than pure in-house control.

Pricing: Custom quote.

3. Avensia

Avensia operates as an omnichannel composable architect with experience across Optimizely, Episerver, Shopify Plus, React, and .NET stacks. It builds modular digital commerce platforms using packaged business capabilities (PBCs) to combine flexibility and structured integration.

For example, the company implemented a headless platform for Nordic Nest using Avensia Excite in an eight-week timeframe.

Their setup typically includes commercetools for transactions, contentful for content, inriver for product information management, and Apptus eSales for search. Also, this firm uses standardized connectors for integration and API-based changes.

Avensia continues working with clients after go-live to fine-tune architecture and maintain system health.

Pros:

•     Includes modular setup with regular updates.
•     Uses a prebuilt ecosystem for integration.
•     Involves ongoing collaboration.

Cons:

•     Complex coordination across multiple systems.
•     Ongoing reliance on third-party vendors.
•     Maintenance costs linked to modular components.

Pricing: Custom quote.

4. SkillNet Solutions

SkillNet Solutions provides end-to-end composable commerce strategy and deployment. It does this through commercetools, Mirakl, Salesforce Commerce Cloud, Spryker, and VTEX.

The company focuses on modular system design, platform evaluation, and managed delivery that connects commerce, cloud, and DevOps disciplines. SkillNet’s micro frontend technology solution, “Beyond Headless,” enables scalable, framework-agnostic applications. SkillNet is also used for component integration within active systems.

The approach modernizes gradually while maintaining existing core systems. It also includes multi-channel integrations across web, mobile, IoT, and in-store systems.

However, SkillNet’s approach is still platform-first: it depends on existing vendor ecosystems and pre-defined integrations. They implement and connect systems, but not fully re-architect or optimize them at the infrastructure and DevOps level.

Nova Cloud, by contrast, builds and runs composable architectures from the ground up.

Pros:

•     Includes a modular design for feature rollout.
•     Allows gradual modernization of legacy systems.
•     Used across multiple commerce platforms.

Cons:

•     Complex multi-platform coordination.
•     Continuous monitoring and maintenance are required.
•     Higher upfront setup costs for multi-system compatibility.

Pricing: Custom quote.

Pro tip: Struggling to keep your Salesforce stack efficient and stable? Explore our guide on Salesforce commerce integrations and consulting services.

5. Dinarys

Dinarys focuses on MACH-aligned composable development and migration across multiple cloud platforms. It works with B2B, B2C, D2C, and C2C commerce models. The company develops API-based systems that use modular components for iterative implementation across projects.

It connects legacy systems, third-party software, and cloud tools through middleware and microservices as part of modernization work. Dinarys also advises on PBC selection and connects technologies like Contentful, commercetools, and Algolia for omnichannel operations.

For instance, this firm built ModaMatrix’s new fashion platform using BigCommerce’s headless framework. The project integrated ERP, CRM, and payment tools for unified operations across web, mobile, and social channels.

Pros:

•     Modular setups with defined delivery timelines and budgets.
•     Connections between legacy and newer systems.
•     Works with different business models.

Cons:

•     Complex legacy integration and architecture planning.
•     High technical skill is needed for MACH maintenance.
•     Longer initial configuration before full rollout.

Pricing: Custom quote.

6. Zaelab

Zaelab delivers modular B2B composable commerce acceleration by integrating SAP, Salesforce, and Shopify with tools like Coveo for search and analytics. It focuses on modular architecture and building eCommerce systems from independent components that align with a specific business setup.

Integration is a standard part of the company’s implementation process.

Existing tools connect with new ones to keep data and workflows synchronized across digital touchpoints. Zaelab’s platforms scale with growth and use open standards to remain adaptable as technology changes.

The firm is a member of the MACH Alliance and contributes its B2B knowledge to advance modular ecosystem adoption.

Compared to Zaelab, Nova’s edge is depth of engineering and infrastructure automation. Zaelab focuses on B2B experience design and system integration, while Nova owns the backend foundation.

Thinking about building your own composable stack? See how Nova Cloud streamlines architecture setup, DevOps automation, and performance monitoring. Book a quick demo to see it in action.

Pros:

•     Modular setups involving multiple vendors.
•     Data management through connected integrations.
•     Work focused on B2B systems aligned with MACH standards.

Cons:

•     Complex setup due to multi-system coordination.
•     Higher initial investment for configuration.
•     Continuous upkeep is required for modular stacks.

Pricing: Custom quote.

7. BetterCommerce

BetterCommerce is a headless and unified commerce platform used by mid-market retail businesses. The company offers omniCX solutions that combine modularity with adaptability for growing brands.

Its system follows a composable, API-first approach that lets teams assemble PIM, CMS, and checkout & payments modules into one scalable ecosystem. Each module operates independently but integrates seamlessly with other tools to support omnichannel operations and real-time data visibility.

BetterCommerce worked with DaMENSCH, a D2C men’s fashion brand, on a modular system update. The setup included PIM, CMS, checkout, and personalization tools for coordinated use across mobile and web platforms.

Pro tip: BetterCommerce sells a composable platform. Nova Cloud builds and optimizes one around your business: cloud-native, AWS-certified, and future-ready.

Pros:

•     Includes modular setup options for different business stages.
•     Uses reusable components for deployment.
•     Involves a selective use of modules for cost control.

Cons:

•     Integrating multiple modules requires technical expertise.
•     Maintenance of modular systems adds an ongoing workload.
•     Custom builds can raise initial costs.

Pricing: Custom quote.

8. Commercetools

Commercetools is a MACH-aligned, API-first, headless commerce platform built for global enterprises. It is used by brands such as Audi and operates across B2B and B2C commerce.

The platform delivers modular building blocks for catalog management, shopping carts, pricing, and order management, all accessible through APIs. Each function runs independently, which allows controlled changes without replatforming.

Its Merchant Center UI is used to handle store data. Meanwhile, developers use GraphQL and HTTP APIs to build integrations and extensions.

As you can see Commercetools gives you the modular APIs and backend commerce logic (catalog, pricing, carts, orders) that enable headless architectures. But it doesn’t handle infrastructure orchestration, DevOps automation, data observability, or AWS-native scaling like Nova does.

Pros:

•     Modular system used for development updates.
•     Cloud-based setup suited for international use.
•     Applicable to both B2B and B2C structures.

Cons:

•     Requires significant technical integration effort.
•     High engineering expertise is needed for setup.
•     Longer onboarding compared to turnkey systems.

Pricing: Custom quote.

Pro tip: Want to scale performance and ROI from your retail initiatives? Read our guide on digital transformation strategies that drive measurable results.

9. BigCommerce

BigCommerce is a composable, scalable ecommerce platform built for both B2B and B2C. It includes ready-to-use B2B features like quoting, invoicing, and localization. The B2B Edition supports hybrid operations, which allows B2B and B2C channels to operate within a single system.

Its buyer portal is open and customizable, with support for integrations with major commerce and marketing tools. The platform connects to 130+ technology and payment partners. Plus, it supports omnichannel storefronts across web, marketplaces, and social platforms.

One implementation example is UPLIFT Desk, which migrated from its legacy storefront to BigCommerce Catalyst, the company’s open-source, headless framework. After the switch, UPLIFT Desk reported faster load times and simpler deployment processes.

Pros:

•     Handles both B2B and B2C operations in one system.
•     Structured for larger-scale use.
•     Connects with multiple partner systems.

Cons:

•     Complex integrations need technical management.
•     Developer oversight is required for advanced customizations.
•     Higher cost for enterprise-grade setup.

Pricing: Custom quote.

10. Elastic Path

Elastic Path offers composable commerce solutions for enterprises that need scalable and flexible architectures. It provides multi-catalog management and modular tools. The platform is also an API-first and built on MACH principles. This structure gives access to core commerce functions through separate service components.

Its composable frontend delivers pre-integrated components with vendors such as Algolia, Klaviyo, and Stripe. The system allows headless development through React and SDKs available in different languages.

Elastic Path also includes tools for A/B testing, product setup adjustments, and Twilio Segment analytics.

One project shows this approach in practice.

Elastic Path worked with T-Mobile and Swisscom to modernize their digital ecosystems using a headless, composable architecture. The setup was used for digital releases across multiple channels and for managing telecom infrastructure.

Pros

•     Includes integrated modules and low-code connectors.
•     Scalable setup across regions and markets.
•     Configurable product and catalog structures.

Cons

•     Requires advanced technical setup.
•     Depends on multiple integrations.
•     Needs regular maintenance.

Pricing: Custom quote.

How to Choose a Composable Commerce Partner

Selecting a composable commerce partner requires finding a team that understands your architecture, scale, and long-term vision. Each vendor approaches integration, governance, and delivery differently, and that impacts how your business evolves after launch.

That’s why it’s worth looking closely at several core areas before committing. These are the key factors to evaluate:

•     Platform expertise & MACH Alliance membership: Confirms alignment with open, modular architecture standards and proven delivery frameworks.
•     Industry-specific experience & case studies: Reveals how the partner applies composable models to your vertical.
•     Headless front-end methodology: Check for frameworks like Hydrogen or Next.js that enable adaptable front-end builds.
•     Integration strategy: Assess how they connect systems like PIM, CMS, search, and order fulfillment.
•     Cloud & DevOps capabilities: Look for automation, CI/CD pipelines, and performance monitoring for scalable uptime.
•     Pricing transparency & modular ROI focus: Review how costs scale by component rather than by full replatform.
•     Support model & maturity: Evaluate SLAs, managed services, and global reach for sustained reliability.

In short, the right partner builds a foundation for composable growth that fits your pace and priorities.

Pro tip: Looking to find the right composable commerce partner for AWS projects? Check out our expert-backed guide for practical insights and recommendations.

Move from Evaluation to Execution with Nova Cloud

Choosing a composable commerce partner is a strategic decision rather than just a technical one. Each provider offers different integration patterns, pricing models, and levels of long-term support.

What matters most is how well the solution fits your architecture, growth plans, and internal capabilities.

Now that you know what to look for, it’s time to see how these principles work in action.

So, book a demo with Nova Cloud today to evaluate a composable framework designed for flexibility, performance, and measurable business impact.

FAQ

What is composable commerce vs. headless commerce?

Composable commerce is the strategy of building a system from modular, interchangeable components. Headless commerce separates the frontend from the backend using APIs, which usually form part of a broader composable setup.

Which components are essential in a composable stack?

A complete stack includes a headless CMS, PIM, search, checkout, and payment processing systems. Each module connects through APIs and supports flexible API orchestration for scalability.

How long does a composable commerce implementation take?

Implementation typically takes three to six months depending on scope and integrations. Projects involving multiple systems or legacy migration may take longer.

How much does a composable consultancy cost?

Most consultancies start with fixed-fee assessments between affordable pricing,000 and competitive pricing,000. Full implementation varies based on architecture complexity and ongoing support.

Why choose these boutique specialists over big integrators?

Boutique partners provide direct collaboration and hands-on developer support across the project lifecycle. Larger firms typically rely on layered teams, which can slow communication and dilute ownership.