***
If you need clarity without renewal pressure, contact Nova to review tradeoffs, model timing, and choose a path that protects uptime, cost predictability, and control.
Broadcom’s changes might have forced you to reassess contracts, cost exposure, and long-term control across your VMware estate. As a result, choosing the top VMware consulting partners now carries real strategic weight.
Some firms profit when you stay and optimize or extend hybrid cloud deployments. Others help you reap the benefits by planning a controlled cloud migration off VMware.
So this article allows you to compare incentives, tradeoffs, and outcomes. Use it to decide which VMware consulting partner best protects uptime, cost predictability, and authority long term.
Let's get started!
VMware consulting companies are firms you bring in to guide and execute decisions about how your VMware environment is run, renewed, or exited. In practice, they guide platform strategy, manage migrations, run day-to-day operations, and advise on licensing and renewal exposure across your IT Infrastructure and VMware stack.
Those choices lock in cost and risk. Some consultants extend VMware solutions inside a private cloud, while others focus on moving workloads out. In practice, optimization preserves the current model, while migration reduces exposure to future licensing, partner, and renewal volatility.
That tension between existing options explains why this market keeps growing.
According to Grand View Research, the global software consulting market reached $273.13 billion in 2022 and is projected to hit $678.32 billion by 2030. That growth reflects rising dependence on external advisors for platform decisions.
But why do these services now matter more than before?
VMware consulting services matter for enterprises because platform decisions now lock in multi-year cost, risk, and control outcomes. Post-Broadcom, advisory choices no longer affect only operations. They shape contract exposure, architectural flexibility, and how much authority you retain over future moves.
With that context, here are the reasons this support now carries strategic weight:
These are general benefits, though, and not all consulting firms are created equal. So, here’s how we evaluated which VMWare consulting companies are the best in the market.
This list reflects how we actually evaluated advisors when cost, risk, and long-term control are on the line. Rather than vendor labels or broad claims, our focus stayed on:
Now, let's review the firms themselves.
Before profiling the top VMware consulting firms, we reviewed which providers could verify partner credentials under Broadcom’s new ecosystem. We found a clear gap between marketing claims and formal authorization.
Of the 10 companies evaluated:
This doesn’t imply illegitimacy, but after Broadcom reduced its authorized network from thousands to a few hundred providers, verification now carries more strategic weight.
Below are the firms we evaluated and how each approaches VMware modernization, optimization, or exit planning.
Keep reading to see their key features, pros, and cons.
Nova exists for one reason, and that's to give you control when VMware stops being predictable. While some consultants help you adjust to Broadcom’s terms, we help you decide whether staying even makes sense with our VMware support solutions.
That difference shapes every recommendation, timeline, and cost model. And because our core partnerships sit outside the VMware ecosystem, we’ll focus on your business outcomes instead of advising you to renew.
Pro tip: Nova holds the AWS Advanced Partner status with access to substantial migration funding: up to $200,000 through the Migration Acceleration Program VMware SPI, plus up to $400 credit per VM through the VMware Migration Accelerator. This totals potential funding up to $2 million across programs.
Here’s how that plays out in practice. You can stabilize VMware while buying time, or you can plan an exit without rushing into risk. With Nova, both the temporary VMware bridge support and the clearly defined AWS-native exit strategy stay open, and the decision stays yours.
Our case work with global retailers, media groups, and regulated enterprises shows this clearly. Some teams used our bridge support solutions to avoid forced renewals, while others used AWS-funded migration programs to exit VMware without budget shock.
For example, in our work with Brightfield, a hard enterprise license renewal forced a platform decision under time pressure. Here, we planned the exit backward from the renewal date.
Basically, we sequenced the migration around the renewal deadline, prioritized high-impact dependencies first, and staged the cutover to avoid downtime. The result was:
This helped the team avoid a forced contract, preserve uptime, and shift long-term costs to a model that stayed predictable after the cutover.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
Global ITN operates as a VMware-focused services provider centered on build, upgrade, and support work. The model stays anchored inside VMware environments rather than on exit planning, though they do offer VMware migration services too.
Its geographic coverage spans Asia-Pacific and parts of Europe, which shapes delivery scope and response windows. Hence, engagement tends to focus on sustaining existing platforms rather than changing long-term direction.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
Evoila is a VMware-centric consulting firm with delivery rooted in the VMware ecosystem. The firm's focus stays on architecture, rollout, and long-term operation of VMware platforms. However, they are present in AWS‑related consulting too according to third‑party profile info.
As such, Evoila can help you keep VMware as the anchor of your environment and support your existing platform commitments. At the same time, it can also help you rethink them.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
F9 Infotech is a VMware consulting firm with delivery centered on hybrid VMware deployments. Its broader model focuses on planning and deploying VMware platforms across regions.
And work typically follows established VMware patterns rather than platform exit analysis. As a result, engagements concentrate on continuity and compatibility.
One case study shows that approach in practice. F9 Infotech supported a global enterprise moving its data center to VMware Cloud on AWS after refactoring proved impractical. HCX handled workload movement while existing networks and security stayed unchanged.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
Adapture operates as a U.S.-based IT consultancy with a VMware-focused services practice. The company's work centers on planning, implementation, and ongoing operation of VMware environments.
Its engagements usually sit alongside broader infrastructure initiatives rather than platform exit programs. That scope keeps attention on continuity and integration inside existing estates.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
Talk to Nova to review your VMware options and decide whether staying or exiting makes sense before renewal pressure limits your choices.
Infonaligy offers VMware consulting services with a delivery model centered on standardized virtualization work. The scope covers planning, rollout, and knowledge transfer (which also strongly implies handover support) across desktop and data center layers.
Besides, much of the work relies on repeatable patterns built from prior engagements. That structure favors consistency over rethinking platform direction.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
LG Networks offers VMware ESXi consulting services primarily targeted at small and mid-sized businesses. As such, they can quickly virtualize their environments with minimal complexity.
LGN’s delivery model centers on rapid deployment, performance tuning, and storage integration for VMware ESXi setups. Their website underlines efficiency, cost savings, and business continuity. To accomplish all this, LG Networks guides clients through virtualization with user-friendly tools and proven best practices.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
True North ITG focuses on VMware consulting alongside managed operations, with a delivery model centered on long-term platform management. They offer custom VMware consulting services (including design, implementation, upgrades, and cloud migrations). This is all backed by VMware‑certified experts as part of broader IT transformation engagements.
Engagements usually extend into outsourced ownership of day-to-day infrastructure decisions. That structure aligns with organizations prioritizing operational continuity over platform change.
In one healthcare engagement, a large clinic moved its VMware environment into a managed cloud setup under True North’s oversight. The workloads were transitioned as-is, and operations were absorbed into a managed model.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
DSR approaches VMware work as part of a broader IT services portfolio rather than a standalone platform strategy. Engagements typically focus on bringing environments onto VMware or maintaining existing deployments over time.
Also, the delivery model leans toward incremental change and ongoing support relationships. So, most decisions stay anchored to sustaining current infrastructure choices.
This fits situations where VMware remains the assumed endpoint and where optimization outweighs reevaluation of long-term platform control.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
GDR Group approaches VMware consulting as part of a long-running IT services practice. Their work usually centers on assessments, environment tuning, and ongoing operational support.
Like other agencies in this review, its engagements tend to focus on refining existing VMware deployments rather than redefining platform direction. That orientation fits organizations planning to continue operating inside VMware for the foreseeable future.
In these situations, VMware remains the assumed baseline and the priority stays on managing cost and stability within that constraint.
Key features:
Pros:
Cons:
In our experience, most issues surface after contracts are signed and not during sales calls. At that point, tradeoffs harden into operating reality, and reversing course becomes costly.
Here are the problems that show up most frequently:
Choosing among the top VMware consulting partners now shapes cost, risk, and control for years. Some IT vendors encourage retention, while others support exit planning. That split affects renewal leverage, migration timing, and operational stability across disaster recovery and data backup.
As a result, staying and migrating lead to different outcomes. One path extends existing terms. The other supports intentional cloud transformation with clearer ownership. To make the right choice, we encourage you to check alignment with your business goals instead of focusing on empty claims or titles.
If your goal is to reassess direction without pressure, contact Nova today to review your options, model tradeoffs, and set a path that fits your constraints.
Nova is the best VMware consulting company for AWS migrations when the goal is to exit VMware entirely rather than extend it on another hosting model. We stay focused on exit planning, funding paths, and sequencing risk instead of extending VMware dependency across hyper-scale clouds.
VMware consulting cost depends on scope, renewal timing, and how much work stays inside VMware versus moves out. Pricing also shifts based on migration depth, operational coverage, and exposure across data center networks and related tooling.
The certifications that matter are VCP (VMware Certified Professional), VCAP Design, VCAP Deploy, and VCDX, because they signal hands-on responsibility for design, deployment, and optimization decisions in production. Entry-level certifications like VCTA add context, but senior outcomes depend on advanced and expert-level credentials tied to real accountability.
Some do, but only when their channel strategy does not rely on keeping you locked into VMware. Nova helps you avoid Broadcom renewal fees by providing bridge support and license review for customers who already hold valid perpetual VMware licenses. That way, renewal timing stays under your control rather than the vendor’s.